The University of Oxford in the U.K. will be taking down the Sackler name from its buildings, spaces, and staff positions following a review of the institution’s relationship with the family whose pharmaceutical company set in motion the opioid epidemic.

The outcome was supported by the Sackler family and approved by the University Council on May 15, according to a statement on the university’s website.

The Sackler name will be removed from two galleries at the Ashmolean Museum—Rome Gallery and the Gallery of Life After Death in Ancient Egypt. The museum’s learning officer and keeper of antiquities positions will no longer bear the tainted family name either.

Sackler Library will now become the Bodleian Art, Archeology and Ancient World Library. The Sackler name has also been removed from the associate professorship of sedimentary geology.

But this does not mean that the institution is completely scrubbing its history with the Sackler family. “The Sackler name will be retained on the Clarendon Arch and on the Ashmolean Museum’s donor board for the purposes of historical recording of donations to the University,” the statement read.

The university also retains all the donations received from the Sackler family and their trusts “for their intended education purposes,” the institution continued, adding that it has not received any new donations from the family and their trusts since January 2019.

Oxford students have been calling for the university to sever ties with the Sackler family, which had given more than £11 million ($13.7 million) in donations to the world-famous institution since 1991, according to Oxford’s student newspaper Cherwell.

But Oxford said in 2018 that it will not reconsider the family’s donations despite the outcry over its involvement in the opioid crisis. The family is the owner of Purdue Pharma, which was responsible for the manufacturing of the addictive opioid OxyContin that claimed more than half a million lives in the U.S. Students again voted in 2021 to rename the Sackler library at a Student Council meeting.

Their effort joins that of artist Nan Goldin, whose activist group P.A.I.N. has been urging cultural institutions to drop the Sackler name since 2017. In recent years, a number of leading institutions around the world, including the Tate, National Portrait Gallery, Victoria and Albert Museum, and the Serpentine in the U.K., the Louvre Museum in Paris, and the Guggenheim and the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York, have severed ties with the Sackler family.

More Trending Stories:  

A Philadelphia Man Paid $6,000 for Cracked Church Windows He Saw on Facebook. Turns Out They’re Tiffany—and Worth a Half-Million 

Mona Lisa’s Other Secret—Where the Portrait Was Painted—May Have Been Solved by an Art Historian Using Drone Imagery 

A Dutch Museum Has Organized a Rare Family Reunion for the Brueghel Art Dynasty—And the Female Brueghels Are Invited to the Party 

The Smithsonian National Museum of African Art’s Director Has Resigned After Less Than Two Years, Citing ‘Resistance and Backlash’ 

‘We’re Not All Ikea-Loving Minimalists’: Historian and Author Michael Diaz-Griffith on the Resurgence of Young Antique Collectors 

The First Auction of Late Billionaire Heidi Horten’s Controversial Jewelry Proves Wildly Successful, Raking in $156 Million 

An Airbnb Host Got More Than They Bargained for with a Guest’s Offbeat Art Swap—and the Mystery Has Gone Viral on TikTok 

Not Patriarchal Art History, But Art ‘Herstory’: Judy Chicago on Why She Devoted Her New Show to 80 Women Artists Who Inspired Her 

An Artist Asked ChatGPT How to Make a Popular Memecoin. The Result Is ‘TurboToad,’ and People Are Betting Millions of Dollars on It 

An Elderly Man Spray-Painted a Miriam Cahn Painting at a Paris Museum After Right-Wing Attempts to Censor It Failed 

The Netflix Series ‘Transatlantic’ Dramatizes the Effort to Evacuate Artists From France During World War II. Here’s What Actually Happened in Real Life